Category

Review

The Starlight is a kind of permanent fixture for any Waterloo student who takes to live performances by indie rock acts.  On Thursday November 5, The Most Serene Republic and Meligrove Band took the stage there.

I recall hearing the Mississauga-based Meligrove Band’s Planets Conspire in a high school cafeteria four years ago, which remains their most recent record. I recognized the lead singer walking on to the stage because he looked the same as he did when they performed at The Mod Club a few years ago; like this, on the left:

Meligrove Band

Meligrove Band

My favourite moments of their set were their old songs – it was a conspiracy between the familiarity of the old album and the catchy hooks that made it perfect for live performance. With the new songs, Meligrove for me became a band with greater depth and thoughtfulness that reached beyond those hooks. I’ve never owned any of their albums, but when their new one is released, I might.

Headliners The Most Serene Republic took stage shortly after Meligrove Band’s finale with “Our Love Will Make The World Go Around”. The first time I listened to this Milton-based band was on an Arts & Crafts 2006 compilation. The Most Serene Republic recently released their third studio release … And The Ever Expanding Universe. It has an aesthetic that is unmistakably Arts & Crafts, much like their previous works. As such, the music has the property of being intensely uplifting and at the same time mellow, which translated very well into performance that night.

The band enjoyed themselves during the set and put on a very cohesive show.  Adrian Jewett made clear his beliefs on the rate of consumption of marijuana in Waterloo (very high).  He also stressed the significance of Starlight’s disco ball:

Adrian Jewett

Adrian Jewett

The exchanges between the vocal lines of Emma Ditchburn and Adrian Jewett somehow had the effect of creating unity amongst audience and performers. Naturally, the new record was the focal point of the evening and the crowd was very receptive. There were cheers all around when the band started up their new single,“Heavens to Purgatory”.

The Most Serene Republic & Crowd

The Most Serene Republic & Crowd

The Most Serene Republic played “In Places Empty Spaces” for their encore to finish up the night. The band began it slowly and it built itself up. It reached through the crowd and lifted them up with its crescendos. When it ended so did the night, and we were gently let back down.

This week, we have three quick reviews for three artist driven films. From a documentary on guitar legends, to a biopic on one of the greatest English poets ever, to a film adaptation of a beloved children’s book: three amazing films about three amazing journeys. Enjoy.

***
It Might Get Loud Review by Aaron Humphrey

A Sony Pictures Classics Film – Official Website
Directed By: Davis Guggenheim
Starring: Jack White, Jimmy Page, and The Edge

On the evening of Saturday, October 10th while the vast majority of university students were attending Oktoberfest halls, I was lowering myself into a theatre seat at the Princess Cinemas eagerly awaiting the house lights to drop, why? Davis Guggenheim’s latest documentary film was gracing the theatres with its presence; from the director of such films as Training Day, An Inconvenient Truth, and most recently Barack Obama’s biographical film People’s President comes It Might Get Loud. The film follows the history of rock ‘n roll’s most distinctive instrument – the guitar. The film focuses on three of rocks most influential guitarists Jack White (The White Stripes and The Raconteurs), Jimmy Page (Led Zeppelin), and The Edge (U2).

It begins on a quiet farm estate with Jack White constructing a blues slide guitar out of a piece of wood, nails, string, a single pick-up, and a coke bottle. From the first blistering notes played out of the “instrument” to the very last notes of the three artists performing a cover of The Band’s “The Weight” on acoustic guitars, the film plays like the instrument they’re discussing – hard and to the note. The movie interweaves the individual artists’ stories concerning their guitars with the unification of the three artists sharing tales at what is dubbed “the Summit”.

Image Courtesy of Sony Pictures Classics

Image Courtesy of Sony Pictures Classics

Being a big Jimmy Page fan and a HUGE Jack White fan (and also a fellow musician), It Might Get Loud was everything I was hoping it to be. While some fans may have been expecting stories from the road concerning Led Zeppelin or U2, the feature stuck tightly and justly to what it was about: the electric guitar. For those of you who were unable to make it down to Princess to watch it don’t despair, the DVD will be released in early 2010. Just look for my face waiting in line because I’m buying it.

***

Bright Star Review by Sonia Laposi

A Pathé Distribution Film – Official Website
Directed and Written by: Jane Campion
Starring: Ben Whishaw and Abbie Cornish

I didn’t want to see Bright Star because I knew that a love affair involving the poet John Keats would not end happily. But then I watched the trailer and it was captivating. The score is like a botanical chant that sinks into and then fades out of the very fine cinematic work of Greig Fraser (Director of Photography). The film opens with a hands-down amazing moment where Keats (Whishaw) slings a brilliant comeback to Mr. Brown (Paul Schneider) , and it is this sort of poetic strength that gives a power to the film and to Keats as a character.

Image Courtesy of Pathé Distribution

Image Courtesy of Pathé Distribution

The movie is honest; it just is. In comparison to other biographical pieces that generate distancing airs of self-importance, it tells a story about a person whose perceived strength does not come from celebrity but from a continuing realization that this was a very sensitive and unique human being. In fact it is enforced by the caring treatment of Keats from the other characters such as Fanny Brawne (Cornish) and Mr. Brown. I, as an audience member, likewise felt that I was witnessing something very special.

The film inspires and praises the notion of the true self in which one can witness in Fanny Brawne, who despite the period she was alive in, was immensely personal and authentic, and therefore strong. From the very beginning, the film follows her stitching passion through the close-up shots of her needle-work and in the homemade outfits she wears. There is a dimension of quirkiness in her clothing, which is visually delicious and inspiring. For example, her clown-collared red and white dress manages to penetrate into the sensibility of our era. It makes you feel as though you are watching someone from the 21st century live in a very odd reality, as opposed to watching that reality birth it’s logical counterparts. This is impart due to the Indie-Romantic visual which the film employs, but also to Fanny’s very down-to-earth mother (Kerry Fox), and her peasant-faced sister Margaret a.k.a. Toots (Edie Martin). But aside from the fantastical fashion found in the film, Bright Star was an inspirational film, which really tried to genuinely depict the great Romantic poet.

***

Where the Wild Things Are Review by Vincent Lai


A Warner Bros. Film – Official Website
Directed by: Spike Jonze
Written by: Spike Jonze and Dave Eggers
Picture Book by: Maurice Sendak
Starring: Max Records and Kathleen Keener
Voiced by: James Gandolfini, James Cooper, and Forrest Whitaker

“Let the wild rumpus start!”

Where the Wild Things Are was for the most part a vivid childhood memory where one probably sat in elementary school reading Maurice Sendak’s tale in which misbehaviour doesn’t always turn out so bad. Director Spike Jonze’s adaptation was a brilliant translation of a children’s story of less than two hundred words and instills the beautiful realm from long lost bedtime stories. However, Jonze had help on the screenplay by author Dave Eggers who recently wrote The Wild Things, a novel inspired by Sendak’s picture book. Not only was it well directed and written, Max Records provided a stellar performance as the protagonist Max – a young boy full of emotions, imagination, and love.

The Wild Things were fabulously integrated in the film, each with their own specific personalities, which reflect Max’s own personas. I admit that I found that the film was a lot darker than I had initially imagined as there was always a creepy uncertainty of what Carol (Gandolfini) was going to do. Would he devour poor little Max or rip him apart limb to limb? However, the Wild Things prove to be loveable as they are relatable, especially my favourites Ira (Whitaker) and Alexander (Paul Dano) who were adoringly insecure and bashful.

Image Courtesy of Warner Bros.

Image Courtesy of Warner Bros.

Karen O of the Yeah Yeah Yeahs was responsible for much of the soundtrack due to her close affiliation with Jonze. A majority of the tracks were wholly befitting of the scenes, specifically where the Wild Things race across the forest and share a group howl. How could one not enjoy a film where a bunch of monsters smash trees, hurl mud balls, and build the most amazing fortress that makes the Forbidden City look like a fort built out of sofa cushions?

If you’ve recently watched a film and would like to review it, please send it to pub@theboar.ca. Please no .docx files for Word documents. Cheers!

 

A Fox Searchlight Film – Official Website
Directed by: Marc Webb
Written by: Scott Neustadter and Michael H. Weber
Starring: Joseph Gordon-Levitt and Zooey Deschanel

Most of my 2009 movie experiences have involved 3D animated movies (Coraline, Monsters vs. Aliens, Up) or big budget Hollywood blockbusters (Star Trek, Transformers 2, Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince), so I was more than elated to finally watch (500) Days of Summer, a film that I will designate as my type of movie (a.k.a. artsy, dark humoured films that fall in a league with Lost in Translation and Wes Anderson films). If the trailer has not already intrigued you or made you laugh, well precious readers my prime incentive of this review is to make you want to watch this movie – I can only rave about it.

While this is director Marc Webb’s first major motion picture, I am more than certain that many of you are already familiar with his work in music videos. He’s directed a plethora of pop-punk videos over the last decade including some early Good Charlotte videos, as well as the majority of the My Chemical Romance oeuvre. However, (500) Days is a major leap for Webb and in many cases it reflects a maturation from making three minute long music videos to an hour and a half feature film. It’s a more adult creation from Webb, he is not trying to recreate teenage angst for pretend goth kids. Instead, Webb is seeking an older, wittier audience who can empathize with the characters and the life experiences that are doled out to them. Also, the music is much much much better, but we’ll leave the soundtrack for a separate review.

The film was narrated by a second-person narrator who directly lets the viewers know that “this is not a love story”. Point taken. While a narrator is not the norm in most films these days, the film itself strays away from the traditional conventions through a number of means. Most notably, the concept of 500 days plays a consistent part throughout the movie. Scenes jump back and forth from Day 422 to Day 128 and so forth. In the end, a coherent yet non-linear story is presented to viewers. The happier scenes from the early days of Tom Hansen (Levitt) and Summer Finn’s (Deschanel) relationship are juxtaposed with similar ones from the latter days when the relationship has subsequently ended and Tom has become the depressing living embodiment of a song by The Smiths. Although the juxtaposition may cause one to feel pity for the Tom character, the stark contrast is hilariously dark humoured and hands down guaranteed to make one laugh out loud. Furthermore, the film makes beautiful use of animation with simple line drawings of LA’s city skyline. But to add to the already delectable creative energy found in the film, one of the most unconventional elements is the random dance scene to Hall and Oates’ “You Make My Dreams”. The elaborate, choreographed dance occurs after Tom and Summer have spent the night together. It can only conjure up the image of a Viagra commercial, but in a good way. Nonetheless, our beloved Tommy from 3rd Rock from the Sun can surely dance his little chicken legs off.

Image Courtesy of Fox Searchlight

Image Courtesy of Fox Searchlight

While most cliché romantic comedies establish an unrealistic and unattainable love affair, (500) Days through its offbeat and quirky ways captures an honest depiction of the rise and fall of what is seemingly a perfect relationship. The key word in that phrase is seemingly since most of us have to come to understand that love is not a Hugh Grant movie, despite the fact that some still wish to see it that way. This is the point that (500) Days emphasizes – we can either be optimists and believe in true love or we can accept the increasing divorce rates as fact and let life take its course. But, we are never set in our beliefs as life comes along to change views and give a little hope. While traditionally and stereotypically it is women that hang onto the notion of everlasting love and men who keep it casual, the gender conventions are reversed in the film. Tom’s blinding devotion to seeing Summer as the One prevents him from seeing the reality of their relationship in which she declares they have “been like Sid and Nancy for months now”. It’s phrases like that that make the break-up scene both depressing and hilariously witty. Despite the break-up, there still remains this aforementioned hope in the film.

The realistic depiction of a romance and the course that most of them take allows the film to be both approachable and charming for the average viewer. Although I won’t spoil the ending, it certainly was much more satisfying than the lame attempt found in another one of my favourite film’s, Garden State. Garden State attempts to end the film on an ellipsis where reality reins in Andrew and Sam, but thirty seconds later that attempt of honesty is copped out for a cheesy Hollywood ending. As a result, I must commend the writers of this film for keeping the conclusion truthful, unpredictable, and a little hopeful.

Aside from the grand dance number found in the film, there are a number of one line zingers, a drunken karaoke scene, an amazingly titled film called Vagiant (half vampire, half giant), and just sheer hilarity for a majority of the film. If you do not have any sort of sense of humour, I am sure you will gain one after this movie. But despite all the laughs, the film is able to present the serious topic of romantic relationships in a thoughtful and thought provoking way. Every year there’s always a little indie film that’s well written, well-directed, and well-acted, and I would have to say that honour goes to (500) Days of Summer – it’s this year’s Juno if you will. It’s charming, it’s witty, it’s clever, it’s honest, and it’s beautiful. What more could you ask for in a film?

If you’ve recently watched a film and would like to review it, please send it to pub@theboar.ca. Please no .docx files for Word documents. Cheers!

So, after much anticipation since the last Harry Potter installment (The Order of the Phoenix in the summer of 2007), I waited in line with hundred of others to catch a midnight screening of Harry Potter and The Half-Blood Prince. Am I tired? Yes. Am I satisfied? YES. In short, it’s the most visually stunning film yet and if I may, probably the best as well. I don’t want to give away any spoilers, but there are some things that should be pointed out.

Director David Yates has returned to provide the same dark tone and aesthetic quality that was found in The Order of the Phoenix (and will stay on for the next two films). The Death Eaters continue to be as menacing as before, building and playing on the film’s darkness. Bellatrix Lestrange (Helena Bonham Carter) plays a bigger role in this film and she often reminds viewers of the death of Sirius Black (Gary Oldman) with her high pitch cackle and blatant shouting of “I killed Sirius Black!”. Although Lord Voldemort is not actively present in this film, Harry (Daniel Radcliffe) and Dumbledore (Michael Gambon) drift into the Pensieve to see past memories of Tom Riddle (Hero Fiennes-Tiffin and Frank Dillane), Voldemort’s childhood and adolescent self. (Interestingly enough, Hero Fiennes-Tiffin is the older Voldemort’s, Ralph Fiennes, nephew.) Both boys appear gravely pale and rather sociopathic, perfect for the conception of a growing Dark Lord. The cave/Inferi scene was the one scene that I believe all readers and viewers were waiting for. It was definitely the eeriest scene, so be prepared.

Like any film adaptation, there are a lot of elements omitted from the book. However, Yates has taken the initiative to change some of the key scenes in the film such as Dumbledore’s showdown with the Death Eaters and the removal of his funeral scene. These are some drastic changes to be made, but according to several interviews, Yates wanted to reflect the dark tone of the film and felt that the funeral scene did not match that ideal. Furthermore, he felt that having two big showdowns at Hogwarts (in the HBP and in The Deathly Hallows) would be redundant for viewers, so he promises a grand scene in the final installment. Hopefully Albus Percival Wulfric Brian Dumbledore gets a proper resting scene in the last film, otherwise I feel that a number of Potter fans will be disappointed in the character’s exit.

But moving on to a lighter note, the film is not all doom and gloom. There are many times when the audience laughed at the quick one-liners by Harry and the gang. Most notably, newcomer Jessie Cave puts on an over the top, hilarious performance as Ron’s over obsessive and overprotective girlfriend, Lavender Brown. Furthermore, Luna Lovegood’s (Evanna Lynch) eccentric wardrobe is worthy of a few chuckles here and there. Rupert Grint as Ron Weasley definitely gives you the LOLs with his awkward demeanour and his aloofness to Harry and Ginny’s budding romance. Freddie Stroma has been getting loads of hype, not particularly for his performance as Cormac McLaggen, but rather his boyish, Abercrombie-esque, good looks. However, he doesn’t appear as the bitter bloke like he does in the book, but rather he tries to put some laughable and slightly inappropriate 14A moves on our beloved Hermione (Emma Watson).

Throughout the year, the cast has grown and matured significantly, so it was only likely that the characters would as well. There are definite moments in which the characters we treasure are not the children we came to adore, but rather are young adults who are placed in adult situations and learning from their experiences. So, expect a lot more emotional scenes, especially following Dumbledore’s death. Our favourite wizards are growing up and through their dark times, we witness their innocence fade as they come to grips with their daunting task of finding and destroying the Horcruxes – and ultimately to destroy Lord Voldemort. As my best friend wrote in her yearbook write-up for senior year (she seriously did write this): Good luck Harry, Ron, and Hermione on your battle against Voldemort! But, I think we all know how that turns out.

Now, all I have to do is wait for the first part of The Deathly Hallows to come out. Let the counting begin!

If you would like to write a movie review for The Boar, please email it to pub@theboar.ca. Please do not use .docx formatting for Word documents. Cheers.

By this point most moviegoers are aware that Johnny Depp is a man of many disguises – an actor who not only plays the characters on the scripts, but one who transforms and becomes the individuals on the screens. In his most recent movie roles he has played eccentric, over the top individuals like Willy Wonka, Sweeney Todd, and most infamously Captain Jack Sparrow, so it was kind of a nice change to see him portray the notorious bank robber, John Dillinger, in his most recent film Public Enemies. Public Enemies is directed by Michael Mann (Ali and Miami Vice) and Depp stars alongside Christian Bale as FBI agent Melvin Purvis and French actress Marion Cotillard (of La Vie en Rose fame) as Dillinger’s girlfriend, Billie Frechette.

The film is a period film and is set during the Great Depression in the American Midwest. Public Enemies depicts the fall of John Dillinger, a bank robber who was the FBI’s first suspect and number one public enemy. At his prime, Dillinger could rob banks in less than two minutes and was notorious for his rabbit-like hops over bank counters, which earned him the nickname ‘The Jackrabbit’. Although Dillinger was a criminal, he was deemed by the public as a modern day Robin Hood who only stole from banks (yet kept the money all to himself). Not only does the movie chronicle the life of Dillinger, it depicts the emergence of the FBI.

Overall, the movie had a bipolar effect in which the plot would progress slowly and then have moments of hyper-action with bank heists and shoot outs. However, the film was still entertaining to watch primarily due to Depp’s and Cotillard’s performances. They had a lovely chemistry on screen and Cotillard’s French charisma is an automatic win. The film also features other known actors like Billy Crudup, Giovanni Ribisi, Leelee Sobieski, Channing Tatum, Emilie de Ravin (a.k.a. Claire from Lost), and more. As you can tell by the long list, the film features a lot of characters and instead of adding to the film’s storyline, it made it slightly more confusing since there were too many faces to remember. Perhaps the film’s greatest weakness comes from one of its biggest stars and main characters – Christian Bale. The weakness in Bale’s portrayal comes from his uninspired performance as Melvin Purvis. He had an unperfected Midwestern accent and for the most part, he was mumbling throughout the film. Furthermore, he was lacking any sort of visible emotion in the film - he simply states his lines and shoots a gun a fewof times. However, what probably clouds my opinion on Bale’s character comes from the fact that the viewers’ sympathy is directed to Dillinger’s character, despite him being the “bad guy”, and as a result Bale’s Purvis becomes the annoying guy who gets in the way of our hero.

If you enjoy bank heists and loud tommy guns, Public Enemies is for you. But, more importantly, if you are a fan of Depp’s work then this film is definitely for you.

P.S. Marion Cotillard had some amazing dresses in the film, so be on the look out for some gorgeous vintage pieces.

If you would like to write a movie review for The Boar, please email it to pub@theboar.ca. Please do not use .docx formatting for Word documents. Cheers.

 

Islands’ lofty aspirations unfulfilled

Arm’s Way
Islands
ANTI-
(2008)

Beach Boy Carl Wilson was famously reported to have said of the band’s Smiley Smile released in 1967, a haphazardly compiled substitution for the much-fabled SMiLE — which would become, until its resurrection in 2004, the most famous unreleased album in pop history — that it was “a bunt instead of a grand slam.” Wilson’s observation reflects an incontrovertible truth about Smiley Smile: it’s under produced, incoherent, and silly. And contrasted with its infamous sibling, it ultimately feels rather inconsequential. This oft-repeated quote, indeed, has often been taken as a wholesale dismissal of the record. But a bunt, properly placed, can still score a run; small balls, in other words, still wins games — even if it does so in an unremarkable manner. Smiley Smile, all things considered, is a pretty wonderful album, even if it hasn’t gone down in history as such.

Perhaps more importantly, it’s an album that raises a difficult question. Is it better to throw down the bunt or to go down on strikes, swinging for the fences? Or, for the sports metaphor-challenged: is it better to aim low and succeed wildly, or to go all out, and fail in a blaze of glory? The legendary narrative of the Beach Boys’ SMiLE certainly says that the latter route is preferable. So too does Arm’s Way, the latest album from Montreal-based indie rock band Islands. Arm’s Way is an album that strikes out, but does so with enough plucky ambition as to still be pretty commendable anyway.

Islands, of course, are (much to the chagrin of band leader Nicholas Thorburn) probably best-known as an offshoot of The Unicorns — a trio who themselves were best known for just being weird. Not “yellow matter custard, dripping from a dead dog’s eye” weird, either, but as truly strange as music can get while still operating within the aesthetic confines of popular music. The Unicorns — between their referential pseudonyms, spastic song construction, and undeniable obscurity — were post-modern pop stars, hell-bent on crafting beautiful pop songs in the most difficult manner imaginable; deliberately accenting surprisingly lush melodies with thick swells of feedback, looping, and lo-fi keyboard licks. And they paired it with a deliberately obtuse lyrical sensibility that fixated on the morbid, the morose, and the often indecipherable. Even their 2004 break-up — two members (Thorburn and Jamie Thompson) going on to form both Islands and an unrelated hip-hop project (Th’ Corn Gangg) — seemed like part of an elaborate put-on.

Islands’ debut, Return to the Sea (2006), only fuelled those suspicions, scraping by as it did on the strength of a Unicorns leftover (“Rough Gem”) and a broadly similar aesthetic ideal, a tongue-in-cheek marriage of chaos and beauty, with a heavy dose of lyrical playfulness. But Return to the Sea polished the edges, and integrated subtle shades of calypso, country, and hip-hop. More importantly, Return to the Sea was a more organic piece of music, a joyous celebration of song cycles, suites, and pocket symphonies. It was still weird, and it wasn’t always successful, but it embodied the band’s deeper aspirations. Thompson departed in 2006, leaving Islands under the sole leadership of Thorburn. And so the question changed: it was no longer a matter of whether Islands would outlive their equine past, but how Thorburn would proceed in the absence of a longtime collaborator. Arm’s Way suggests that it’s a stupid question, continuing as it does, in relentless pursuit of a contemporary — albeit considerably subverted — equivalent to the lush, harmonic, and profoundly affecting pop that the Beach Boys rode to popular and critical acclaim some forty years ago.

Which is why Smiley Smile comes immediately to mind as the twelve songs on Arm’s Way unfurl. Because Arm’s Way sounds, when all is said and done, like Nicholas Thorburn’s attempt at crafting his own SMiLE. But given that it took Brian Wilson — the real Brian Wilson — two tries and forty years to make SMiLE, it goes without saying that Thorburn’s opus still has yet to be written.

Amongst other issues, Thorburn doesn’t have the vocal prowess — indeed, his nasal falsetto is a stark counterpoint to Arm’s Way’s immaculate arrangements. But he and his band certainly have the compositional chops to craft something special. Arm’s Way comes from the same intellectual and emotional drive that compelled Brian Wilson to spend $50,000 recording “Good Vibrations” over seventeen sessions and six months in 1966: the compulsion to do whatever it takes to achieve a vision of perfection — splicing disparate song fragments, incorporating string, horn, and woodwind arrangements, tossing on multiple overdubs, obscure instrumental flourishes, and programmed drum loops.

And make no mistake: Arm’s Way is front-loaded with incredible songs. Album opener “The Arm,” for example, explodes into a rock-solid groove that’s accentuated by searing string fills, set to a pastiche of gaudy horror film imagery. So too is the garishly infectious “Creeper,” a percussive, synth-heavy composition which pairs a deliberate pop hook with a terrifying predilection for the details of violent crime.

That tendency isn’t isolated to a few shocking moments, either. Arm’s Way slinks by in the shadows, existing in the dark recesses of a world where the macabre takes center stage — a world where a partial re-write of The Who’s “A Quick One, While He’s Away,” about amputation, wouldn’t seem out of place. Slyly inserted, as it is, into the closing minutes of the shapeshifting “In The Rushes,” it doesn’t. Unfortunately, the same can’t be said for Arm’s Way’s other musical tangents, which become increasingly fragmented, chaotic, and confusing (the otherwise tense “Life In Jail,” for example, breaks momentarily, in order to bring us a cheery rock and roll hoedown).

There are few artists capable of singing a couplet like “You said you had my back / But I was attacked by a pack of dogs frothing at the mouth,” without betraying even a hint of metaphorical intent. Yet Thorburn rattles these lines off in “J’aime Vous Voir Quitter” with alarming regularity — and that’s both one of his greatest strengths and weaknesses: it’s quirky, and it’s appropriately tongue-in-cheek, but it’s inevitably hollow. “Kids don’t know shit / Everything they’ve learned is wrong,” from the track “Kids Don’t Know Shit” isn’t, fundamentally, a huge leap from the subtext of, say, “Wouldn’t it be nice if we were older / Then we wouldn’t have to wait so long.”

Taken so literally, though, what’s the point? If it weren’t for the mostly stunning musical accompaniment, and the dazzling production, I would argue that there is none. And even though those redeeming features ultimately begin to fall apart, however, Arm’s Way retains enough momentum to scrape by. Barely, too — 11-minute closer “Vertigo (If It’s A Crime)” is a poorly paced, epic mess — but in a way that’s still kind of charming.

Arm’s Way is no SMiLE. It isn’t even a Smiley Smile, really. It’s over-long, unfocussed, and lyrically difficult. That said, Arm’s Way is also so ambitious that it’s certainly never anything less than interesting, an appeal crystallized in the momentary bursts of brilliance that make sifting through it a worthwhile pursuit: infectious hooks, dense melodies, and lush arrangements that — if only in spurts of a few seconds, or a few moments at most — suggest something profoundly magnificent in the creative process of Thorburn and his compatriots. Arm’s Way, really, is oblivious of its own limitations. But that obliviousness — manifesting itself, as it does, in a pervasive kind of wide-eyed musical naiveté — makes even its most glaring shortcomings seem profoundly magical.

Sooner or later, everyone fails at something. Arm’s Way, if nothing else, is proof that there’s a way to fail with such style and such grace that success seems kind of beside the point anyway.

It’s entirely possible that Georgia/Alabama quintet Drive-By Truckers are simultaneously utterly sincere and wholly ironic about their unusual brand of roots rock revival. Their body of work is an epic identity crisis splashed out over the running time of their eight albums, which enacts a twelve-year wrestling match between the inherent contradictions of the Indie and Southern cultures that the band precariously straddles. The band’s 2001 release, Southern Rock Opera, suggests that the desire to leave the South is a core part of Southern identity. The relative truthfulness of this theory has no bearing on the fact that their most recent album, Brighter Than Creation’s Dark (2008), is a fairly tepid affair.

Drive-By Truckers’ combined eight-album discography is a collection of muscular, defiantly Southern rock and roll that echoes a fusion of Lynyrd Skynyrd, Crazy Horse, the Rolling Stones, Tom Petty, and Townes Van Zandt. I liked Brighter Than Creation’s Dark as an independent work, but found that its predecessor, A Blessing and a Curse (2006), is a great record that is gritty, vibrant, hook-filled, and smart. Comparatively, it makes Brighter Than Creation’s Dark look like a middle-of-the-road country rock album.

A Blessing And a Curse isn’t defined by its red-state, minstrelsy, roots rock. It’s a Southern record that uses Southern stories to offer universal insight into the human condition. Its deference to the universality of the album’s stories, rather than its degree of Southernness, also makes A Blessing And a Curse Drive-By Truckers’ most authentic Southern record. It marks the point where this Southernness finally ceases to be the totality of their art and becomes a solidified aspect of their collective history that influences their music without subjugating it. Brighter Than Creation’s Dark briefly shows glimpses of this brilliance, precisely because it rejects that newfound universalism in favour of a set of songs that is mostly regional and often stereotypical. The song writing is good, even occasionally wonderful, but the quintet seems senselessly preoccupied with telling Southern stories simply because of their origin, not for their worldly relevance, indicating an awareness of the fact that they’re selling themselves to an elite, heartily guffawing, northern liberal audience.

It almost seems that Brighter Than Creation’s Dark is consciously avoiding the equal intellectual footing of its predecessor in favour of cheap stereotypes and tawdry drama. This album seems hell-bent on proving that Neil Young’s dystopian glimpses of the South weren’t completely inaccurate, while at the same time employing the similarly organic, ragged intensity of Young’s Crazy Horse backing band.

This is not to say that Brighter Than Creation’s Dark doesn’t have its fair share of insight. Even if it is senselessly typecast and occasionally absurd, it’s hard not to be moved by the destructive alcoholism of “Daddy Needs A Drink,” or the post-mortem foreboding of “Two Daughters and A Beautiful Wife.” The emotions seem authentic, but the Alabama anguish is at times too heavy-handed to really be affecting.
If A Blessing And a Curse can tell us nothing else, it’s that the Drive-By Truckers are well-served when smart song writing is complemented by their three-guitar, ferociously hard rock sound; one that balances out their records, providing that epic moment of catharsis after a slow-burn acoustic build-up. Unfortunately, a lot of the hook-heavy, balls-out rock numbers were written by Jason Isbell, whose “Daylight” and “Easy on Yourself” are just two of many highlights on Curse. Brighter Than Creation’s Dark marks the Truckers’ first album since Isbell’s departure. Consequently, this outing is somewhat more low-key — a spiritual cousin to their very early, very countrified albums. Due to the weighty balladry, Brighter Than Creation’s Dark lacks the Drive-By Truckers’ catharsis, leaving it feeling mopey, morose, and seemingly pointless.

The Truckers have always done their best work in the form of compelling Southern character studies, which they continue with mixed results on Brighter Than Creation’s Dark. In the Stones-y ballad “Check Out Time In Vegas,” an illegal gun runner mulls over his limited options; a dead father wonders what will become of his family on “Two Daughters and a Beautiful Wife,” juxtaposed by a banjo and a startlingly exuberant, thump-on-the-guitar-top beat. Others are sketched a bit too broadly and, as a result, the characters become caricatures.

“The Righteous Path” and “A Ghost to Most,” meanwhile, are the closest to hard rock anthems on the album, while “Daddy Needs A Drink” is the album’s most heart-wrenching song. A reflection of paternal alcoholism layered upon drifting organ, funereal shuffle brush drums, and careful acoustic fills, the song exemplifies the kind of universal narrative that has allowed Drive-By Truckers to transcend their hokey roots. “The Man I Shot” similarly transcends Neil Young’s “Southern Man” burlesque: an Iraq War story featuring a narrator who finally realizes that the man he shot was, like himself, just doing his job, but the story is lost in the mire of sinister power chords, muddy production, and needless repetition.

As a set of individual songs, Brighter Than Creation’s Dark is generally above reproach. The overwhelming, suffocating, country-ballad-shuffle sound and the uneven song writing contributions make it sound more like an awkwardly-sequenced mixed tape than a professionally recorded LP from a well-respected band. At 75 minutes and 19 tracks, Brighter Than Creation’s Dark inevitably becomes an exhausting affair: drawn out, lumbering, and somewhat lifeless. After sifting through the clutter, there’s certainly a stellar, pared-down, 25 minute EP that is alternately beautiful, tragic, and guardedly optimistic; an album that’s still exhausting, but in a more positive way. Brighter Than Creation’s Dark’s future is as one of those records that people “love,” but only because it’s already been judiciously vetted and condensed on its way to their iPods.